Skip to content
● Live
Live Islamic date, local prayer times, and rotating source-attributed wisdom.

Sponsored

Partner offers

17 Ramadan 2 AH · 624 CE (traditional date) · Badr, Hijaz

Battle of Badr · Wells and Two Slopes

غزوة بدر

غزوۂ بدر

Field atlas · Terrain

Interactive 3D map

Preparing the 3D scene…
Educational geographic reconstruction. Marker positions and terrain are schematic, not surveyed battle coordinates.

Historical maps album

58 local-first records

Historical overview

Terrain study of the Badr basin, water wells and the two approaches commonly identified as al-Udwat al-Dunya and al-Udwat al-Quswa. The model simplifies topography and does not assert exact troop coordinates.

Historical context and how to read this record

This record presents Battle of Badr · Wells and Two Slopes, dated in the archive as 17 Ramadan 2 AH · 624 CE (traditional date) and associated with Badr, Hijaz. The date, place, summary, named groups, terrain features, and references shown here come from the bundled or published event record. They provide a concise entry point for study, while the linked source notes remain the place to check what each historical or religious text actually reports. A label in the archive is not, by itself, proof that every chronology, number, or interpretation is agreed across historians.

The timeline on this page is deliberately limited to information attached to the record: its displayed event date and era, its named location, and the geographic markers that the map author normalized for the scene. These map markers are not a minute-by-minute sequence of movements. They do not claim to reconstruct every decision, speech, or formation. Where historians preserve differing accounts, the distinction matters: a conventional date can help readers orient themselves, but a date recorded in a database should not be mistaken for a universally settled day or for a primary-source quotation.

The terrain is a deterministic educational model. A shared height function keeps water, formations, landmarks, and ground visually aligned; the normalized coordinates make the same record render consistently when the optional cloud archive is unavailable. This approach supports comparison of broad relationships—such as a camp in relation to a water feature, a fortified settlement against a highland, or a route beside a valley—without presenting synthetic elevation as archaeological survey data. Lighting, camera angle, and visual scale are choices for legibility, not evidence about the historical scene.

Read the forces and commanders panel as a record of the labels supplied for this map, not as an independently verified census. Estimates in classical narratives can differ because authors preserve separate transmissions, use rounded totals, or describe groups in different ways. This page keeps uncertainty notes attached to the relevant record when they are available. A missing strength estimate means the archive does not make one here; it should not be filled by inference from the size of a marker or from the appearance of the 3D scene.

The source dossier names the references bundled with this event, including Qur’anic passages or classical works where supplied. Numbering, chapter divisions, translations, and pagination can vary by edition, so a careful citation should identify the edition and translator consulted. A source title in the list is a research lead, not a claim that the entire event is established by that work alone. Compare the passages in context, separate a source’s wording from later commentary, and consult qualified scholarship when a question concerns creed, law, or a contested historical conclusion.

For an efficient study sequence, begin with the short overview, note the event date and place, then select each geographic marker in the dual reader. The camera will move to the schematic coordinate while the corresponding source note is brought into view. Next compare the land and water features, read any force labels and their uncertainty notes, and return to the source dossier before drawing conclusions. This order helps distinguish what the archive records, what the visualization illustrates, and what a reader may need to verify in a primary edition. The purpose is source-aware orientation and respectful learning, not a substitute for historical fieldwork or a scholar’s judgment.

Record timeline and tactical markers

  1. Archive date: 0624-03-13 · 17 Ramadan 2 AH · 624 CE (traditional date)
  2. Recorded setting: Badr, Hijaz
  3. Map feature 1: Wind-shaped sand dunes
  4. Map feature 2: Al-Udwat al-Dunya and al-Udwat al-Quswa
  5. Map feature 3: Badr wells and water access
  6. Map feature 4: A schematic command shelter (ʿArīsh)
  7. Schematic marker 1: Muslim force · Prophet Muhammad (s.a.w.w.) · Traditional reports commonly give about 300–317
  8. Schematic marker 2: Meccan force · Quraysh leadership · Traditional reports commonly give about 900–1,000

Marker ordering is a reading aid, not a chronological claim about the event.

Forces and commanders

  • Muslim force — Prophet Muhammad (s.a.w.w.) (Traditional reports commonly give about 300–317)
  • Meccan force — Quraysh leadership (Traditional reports commonly give about 900–1,000)

Geography: water and landscape

  • Badr wells (wells)
  • Seasonal wadi (wadi)
  • Wind-shaped sand dunes
  • Al-Udwat al-Dunya and al-Udwat al-Quswa
  • Badr wells and water access
  • A schematic command shelter (ʿArīsh)

Sources

  • Qur’an 3:123–125
  • Qur’an 8:5–19 and 8:42
  • Ibn Hisham, al-Sirah al-Nabawiyyah (edition-dependent details)
  • The ʿArīsh and formations are schematic interpretive aids

Continue the source trail

More 3D maps

Sponsored

Partner offers

Optional external offers. Open only when you choose.